ACTIO PAULIANA SEBAGAI UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN BAGI KREDITOR MENURUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU)

Rai Mantili(1),


(1) Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Actio Pauliana is the right given to a creditor to cancel the debtor’s agreement with a third party. The purpose of this actio pauliana is to avoid losses from its creditors, by requesting the court to cancel the debtor’s legal action which is deemed to be detrimental to his creditors. Actio Pauliana provisions apart from being regulated in the Civil Code, are also regulated in Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Repayment Obligation (UUKPKPU). However, the two rules have several diff erences. In this paper, the author wants to explain about Actio Pauliana which is regulated in the Civil Code and Actio Pauliana which is regulated in UUKPKPU in order to provide protection for creditors. This writing gives the result that Actio Pauliana’s lawsuit which is regulated in the Civil Code is submitted to the District Court and cannot be justifi ed and can take a long time. Unlike the case with Actio Pauliana which is regulated in the UUPKPU, the fi ling of a lawsuit is made to the Commercial Court and can be proven simply so that it can provide more protection for creditors.


Keywords


actio pauliana; bankrupty; creditors protection;debtor.

References


Buku:

Fuady Munir, 2005, Hukum Pailit Dalam Teori Dan Praktek, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti

D, Donell, John, et. al., 1983, Law for Business, Illionis: Richard D. Irwin, Inc

G, Baird Douglas & H. Jackson, Thomas, 1985, Fraudulent Conveyance Law and its Proper

Domain, 1985, 38 Vand. L. Rev.

G, Baird Douglas dan Daniel V. Davidson, et. al., 1987, Comprehensive Business Law Prinsiples and Cases, Boston: Kent Publishing Company.

G.W, Paton, 1975, A text book of jurisprudence.Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Jono, 2008, Hukum Kepailitan, Sinar Grafi ka, Jakarta, 2008

Lontoh, Rudhi, Kailimang, Denny, Ponto, Benny, 2001, Penyelesaian Utang Piutang Melalui Pailit Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Alumni, Bandung.

Muljadi, Kartini dan Widjaja, Gunawan, 2002, Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers.

Remy, Sutan Sjahdeini, 2004, Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Faillissements Verordening Juncto UU No. 4 Tahun 1998, Jakarta: PT Pustaka Utama Grafi ti.

Subekti, 2001, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, PT. Intermasa, Jakarta.

Sastrawidjaja, Man S, 2006, Hukum Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, PT. Alumni, Bandung.

Yani, Ahmad Dan Widjaja, Gunawan 1999, Seri Hukum Bisnis Kepailitan, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Jurnal:

M. Alvi Syahrin, “Actio Pauliana, Konsep Hukum Dan Problematikanya”, Jurnal Lex Librum,Vol. IV, No. 1, Desember 2017.

Elisabeth Nurhaini Butarbutar, 2019, “Pembuktian Terhadap Perbuatan Debitor Yang Merugikan Kreditur Dalam Tuntutan Actio Pauliana Kajian Putusan Nomor 07/Pdt.Sus-Actio Pauliana/2015/Pn.Niaga.Mdn”, Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 12 No. 2 Agustus.

Peraturan Perundang-undangan:

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban

Pembayaran Utang (PKPU).

Het Herziene Indonesich Recht (HIR)

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Nomor 3 tahun 1998 Tentang Penyelesaian Perkara


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 239 times
PDF Download : 65 times

DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.127

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.